C.S. Lewis's Christian apologetics [electronic resource] : pro and con / edited by Gregory Bassham.
Material type: TextSeries: Value inquiry book series: 286.; Value inquiry book seriesPhilosophy and religion: Publisher: Leiden : Brill Rodopi, c2015Description: 1 online resource (xi, 272 p.)Other title: C.S. Lewis' Christian apologetics | Christian apologeticsSubject(s): Lewis, C. S. (Clive Staples), 1898-1963 -- Criticism and interpretation | Lewis, C. S. (Clive Staples), 1898-1963 | Apologetics | ApologeticsGenre/Form: Criticism, interpretation, etc.Additional physical formats: No title; Electronic version:: No titleDDC classification: 239 LOC classification: PR6023.E926 | Z5994 2015Online resources: Click here to access onlineItem type | Current location | Call number | URL | Status | Notes | Date due | Barcode | Item holds |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
電子資源 | 圖書館 | Link to resource | Available | 登入帳密請洽館員 |
Includes bibliographical references (p. 249-265) and index.
Editorial foreword / Preface ; Introduction / The argument from desire. The argument from reason. The moral argument. The trilemma argument. The problem of evil. Kenneth A. Bryson -- Gregory Bassham -- Peter S. Williams ; Gregory Bassham ; Peter S. Williams ; Gregory Bassham -- Victor Reppert ; David Kyle Johnson ; Victor Reppert ; David Kyle Johnson -- David Baggett ; Erik J. Wielenberg ; David Baggett ; Erik J. Wielenberg -- Donald S. Williams ; Adam Barkman ; Donald S. Williams ; Adam Barkman -- Philip Tallon ; David L. O'Hara ; Philip Tallon ; David L. O'Hara. Pro: a defense of C. S. Lewis's argument from desire / Con: Quencing the Argument from Desire / Reply to Gregory Bassham / Reply to Peter Williams / Pro: The Argument from Reason Defended / Con: Naturalism Undefeated / Reply to David Kyle Johnson / Reply to Victor Reppert / Pro: The Moral Argument is Convincing / Con A Critique of the Moral Argument / Reply to Erik Wielenberg / Reply to David Baggett / Pro: A Defense of C.S. Lewis's "Trilemma" / Con: Lewis's Trilemma: Case Not Proven / Reply to Adam Barkman / Reply to Donald WIlliams / Pro: The Problem of Pain Defended / Con: C.S. Lewis on Evil: At Best a Likely Story / Reply to David L. O'Hara / Reply to Philip Tallon /
Available to subscribing member institutions only.
Are C. S. Lewis's major arguments in defense of Christian belief sound? In C. S. Lewis's Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con, defenders and critics of Lewis's apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis's arguments from desire, from reason, from morality, the "trilemma" argument for the divinity of Christ, as well as Lewis's response to the problem of evil. By means of these lively, in-depth debates, readers will emerge with a deeper understanding and appreciation of today's most influential Christian apologist.